Hickok

2017

Western

13
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 50%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 21%
IMDb Rating 4.8 10 1369

Synopsis


Uploaded By: FREEMAN
Downloaded 104,535 times
November 28, 2017 at 06:53 AM

Cast

Luke Hemsworth as Wild Bill Hickok
Bruce Dern as Doc Rivers O'Roark
Kris Kristofferson as George Knox
720p 1080p
655.62 MB
1280*720
English
NR
23.976 fps
1hr 28 min
P/S 19 / 225
1.35 GB
1920*1080
English
NR
23.976 fps
1hr 28 min
P/S 16 / 126

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by Chum griffin 1 / 10

Doesn't get any worse than this

Disappointing is a word I would normally use when discovering a below par movie, but I did not expect much from this movie to begin with so the bar was set quiet low in my expectation. Somehow the director managed to lower that bar considerably. Terrible direction, no style of any kind whatsoever.. terrible sound editing,, a gunshot sounds like someone farted loudly.. awfully clichéd dialogue, wooden acting at its worst, lighting was poor, cinematography was childlike and vacuous,. This was a calamitous endeavour from start to finish. Watch it only to learn how not to make a western.

Reviewed by sharpwar8 1 / 10

don't waste your time

This movie was just plain bad. Nothing about it was remotely factual to true events of Hickok's life. That might be the only thing true to who he was. He was a notorious liar or blow hard about events in his life, but that is the only thing common to this movie that holds true. The acting is shyte. Not one person who is in this film has a sense of who they are playing, so they just seem lost as to what they are supposed to do. The opening of this movie depicts hickok in his union days having to leave a wounded soldier to die, thus leaving him with remorse........ no accounts of this at all in real life, so why put it in the script. In fact the only two things Hickok ever had remorse for was the very first man he killed, whilst hiding behind curtains. He paid that mans widow 35 dollars, and said he was sorry for doing it. The next was him killing his own deputy who was trying to come to hickoks aide. Nothing in the movie about these things. For heavens sake, they didn't even bother to look the part. Hickok had long curly red hair....... hemsworth short dark brown. I honest don't know why they would have made this movie, my guess is trying to capitalize off the success of films like Unforgiven and Tombstone, sadly they don't come close to either film. Hickok was a real piece of work, but he survived having tremendous luck, (until it ran out) and grit. A good story could have been told about that, and I am sure would have done well.

Reviewed by boggie4758 1 / 10

Beyond awfulness

Where to begin. This movie was beyond awfulness. It is as if some guys had way too many beers and in a stupor wrote out the script on a dirty napkin. The acting was deplorable. It was as if they were reading cue cards that were to far to read. The acting was wooden and in slow motion. They had a excellent opportunity to make a half decent western with Kris and Trace in the mix. Even Bruce could have done much better even though he is as old as dirt and really needs to stop acting. I think he was thrown in the mix to make a interesting cast that fell flat. Who in their right mind would cast Hemsworth to play Hickok anyway. This man can't act out of a wet paper bag guys. The script was awful and the direction was just down right bad and the acting was on a whole level of terrible. It was just like someone else said, it was like watching a train wreck, you couldn't stop watching it because you was hoping it would get better but never did. This was a 101 lesson on how not to make a western or any other kind of movie. This really was a very bad movie. I was wishing for more because I really love westerns but man oh man this thing stunk.

Read more IMDb reviews

2 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment